Field Audits
The generation of high-quality data does not start in the laboratory—it starts in the field. Improperly collected samples will likely result in poor data quality and analytical results that do not accurately reflect the media being characterized. Likewise, inadequate pre-event planning often leads to an inefficient sampling event requiring sampling personnel to work through problems and questions in the field, distracting them from the primary task of proper sample collection. Field auditing is an effective tool used to identify and correct any planning, sampling, and documentation deficiencies before they become consequential.
A field sampling audit provides a non-biased review of the sampling and monitoring procedures being conducted and compares them to the project requirements and recognized industry practices. The primary goal is to identify non-conforming items that have the potential to negatively affect data quality, institute corrective actions, and promote continuous program improvement.
Following a field audit, a debriefing is conducted, and a formal report or project memorandum is generated by Environmental Standards. The debriefing typically includes the client and the audited party and is used to provide feedback on observations and findings identified during the audit, ensure the sampling personnel fully understand the findings observed, and includes recommendations regarding process improvements and corrective actions.
This non-biased review of field procedures conducted during site investigations and sampling programs helps identify quality deficiencies prior to generating environmental data. Field auditing of sample collection procedures is effective in implementing real-time corrective action measures, and as such, is an integral step in ensuring the generation of high-quality data during your program life cycle.
Our auditors identify issues associated with data collection, sample collection, and recordkeeping before they become problematic. Audit results can be used to evaluate contractor performance, to document compliance with regulatory requirements, and as “lessons learned” with the ultimate goal of program improvement.
Joe Kraycik, P.G.
Senior Consulting Geoscientist
